当前位置:循环首页>正文

[IHF2011]冠心病介入治疗中支架选择策略及并发症——Prof. Ting 专访

作者:  HenryH.Ting   日期:2011/8/25 16:18:20

国际循环网版权所有,谢绝任何形式转载,侵犯版权者必予法律追究。

<International Circulation>: What are the common types of coronary stents currently used in clinical practice? For each, could you summarize their advantages and disadvantages?

    Henry H.Ting  美国梅奥医学中心

    <International Circulation>: What are the common types of coronary stents currently used in clinical practice? For each, could you summarize their advantages and disadvantages? 

  《国际循环》:目前临床应用的冠脉支架有哪些类型?您来谈谈每种类型的优缺点有哪些?
    Prof Ting: The two most common types of coronary stents we use in clinical practice in the United States as well as China are drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents. The main benefit of drug-eluting stents is the decrease in the risk of restenosis. Restenosis occurs when the blockage which has been treated returns within the first six to twelve months. The drug-eluting stents have revolutionized our treatment with coronary stents by decreasing that rate from approximately 15% - 30% with bare-metal stents to about 5% - 10% with drug-eluting stents. That is the main advantage of drug-eluting stents. That does come with a cost. With the drug-eluting stents, you have to take blood thinners, notably aspirin and clopidogrel, continuously for twelve months. If you stop that therapy, you are at very high risk of developing a blood clot in that stent. That is the main downside of using drug-eluting stents. The bare-metal stents have been around since 1994 and when they were originally introduced they revolutionized the way we treated coronary artery disease and blockages. The bare-metal stents have a higher risk of restenosis (as I said, 15%-30% as opposed to 5%-10%) but the good thing about bare-metal stents is that the risk of a blood clot is much lower and blood thinning medication (aspirin and clopidogrel) is only required for one month. In this day and age, I would estimate that about 75%-80% of procedures that will relieve blockages in coronary arteries are done with drug-eluting stents and 15%-20% done with bare-metal stents.

    Prof Ting:在中-美两国最常应用的支架不外乎药物洗脱支架(DES)和金属裸支架(BMS)。DES最大的优点在于有效降低再狭窄风险,而再狭窄的发生最常见于术后6-12个月。DES的应用无疑是支架技术革新的里程碑,它将BMS支架内再狭窄15-30%的数据减少到5-10%。但DES的应用会增加治疗费用,患者必须在术后坚持抗血小板治疗,持续服用阿司匹林,氯吡格雷至少12个月。如果间断药物治疗,支架内血栓的风险将大大增高,这是DES最大的劣势。BMS开始应用于1994年,开创了介入治疗冠脉疾患和狭窄的先河。BMS的缺点在于再狭窄率高(我之前所言相对于DES它的发生率为15%-30% vs 5%-10%),优点在于其支架内血栓风险低,且术后仅需服用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷片一个月。目前冠脉介入手术中大约有80%的手术会选用DES,而15-20%选用BMS。

[1]  [2]  [3]  下一页

版面编辑:沈会会  责任编辑:张衡


冠心病介入治疗PCI药物洗脱支架DES金属裸支架BMSProf. Ting

分享到: 更多


设为首页 | 加入收藏 | 关于我们 | 联系方式 | 招贤纳士
声明:国际循环网( www.icirculation.com)对刊载的所有文章、视频、幻灯、音频等资源拥有全部版权。未经本站许可,不得转载。
京ICP备15014970号-5  互联网药品信息服务资格证书编号(京)-非经营性-2017-0063  京公网安备 11010502033353号  增值电信业务经营许可证:京ICP证150541号
国际循环 版权所有   © 2004-2024 www.icirculation.com All Rights Reserved
公司名称:北京美赞广告有限公司 公司地址:北京市朝阳区朝阳门北大街乙12号天辰大厦1座1409 电话:010-51295530